Relationships between narrative and argumentation: a brief theoretical approach
Abstract
The main aim of this paper is to present a classification of the different ways in which narrative and argumentation may be related. In order to do so, we are going to define some concepts: narration and argumentation as certain types of speech-acts and narrative and argumentative texts as sets which are mainly composed by speech-acts of one type or another. The presented classifications will be based in this account, and will be defined according to two different criteria: the first one, of an estructural type, distinguish different ways in which an argumentative speech act can appear into a narrative text, by considering the nature of the adresser: a character, the narrator or the author. The second classification refers to the role performed by an argumentative speech act inside a narrative text or by an narrative speech act inside a argumentative text on the another hand. The presented classifications will be compared and analyzed with respect to the accounts by Paula Olmos (2013) and Gilbert Plumer (2015).References
Ayers, L. (2010). Getting arguments out of narrative. Manuscrito no publicado. Compartido el 19 de octubre de 2010 en ARGTHRY, el listserv de la Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, Ontario, Canadá.
Bermejo-Luque, L. (2011). Giving Reasons. A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory. Argumentation, 26(2), 291-296.
Lázaro Carreter, F. (1987). La literatura como fenómeno comunicativo. En van Dijk, T. A., & Mayoral, J. A. (eds.), Pragmática de la comunicación literaria (pp. 151-170). Bibliotheca Philologica. Serie Lecturas. Arco/Libros.
Currie, G. (1990). The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dijk, T. A. van (1996). Estructuras y funciones del discurso. México: Siglo XXI.
Fisher, W. y R. Filloy. (1982). Argument in drama and literature: An exploration. En J. R. Cox y C. A. Willard (eds), Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research (pp. 346-362). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (1975). Truth and method (2 (1989)). London. Sheed and Ward Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1086/486539
García-Carpintero, M. (2016). Relatar lo ocurrido como invención: una introducción a la filosofía de la ficción contemporánea. Madrid: Cátedra.
Garrido Domínguez, A. (1996). Teoría de la literatura y literatura comparada: el texto narrativo. Madrid: Síntesis.
Genette, G. (1980). Narrative Discourse. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Govier, T., y L. Ayers. (2012). Logic and Parables: Do These Narratives Provide Arguments? Informal Logic, 32(2), 161-189.
Grice, H.P. (1975) Logic and conversation. En P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts (pp.41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Hunt, L. H. (2009). Literature as Fable, Fable as Argument. Philosophy and Literature, 33(2), 369-385.
Iser, W. (1979). The act of reading. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Kock, C. (2009). Choice is not true or false: The domain of rhetorical argumentation. Argumentation, 23(1), 61-80.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1992). Love’s knowledge: essays on philosophy and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Olmos, P. (2013). Narration as argument. En Mohammed, D. y M. Lewinsky (eds.), Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013 (pp. 1-14). Windsor, Ontario: OSSA.
Plumer, G. (2015). On novels as arguments. Informal Logic, 35(4), 488-507.
Prince, G. (2003). A dictionary of narratology. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
Romero Álvarez, M. L. (1996). El relato periodístico como acto de habla. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas Y Sociales, 41, 9-27.
Searle, J. (1979). A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. En Searle, J., Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts (pp. 1-29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D. (2000). Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. En Sperber, D. (ed.), Metarepresentations: a multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 117-137). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walton, D., Reed, C., y F. Macagno. (2008). Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williamson, G. (2014). Inference [artículo]. SLTinfo. Recuperado de: https://www.sltinfo.com/inference/ [June 18, 2017]
Williamson, T. (1996). Knowing and Asserting. The Philosophical Review, 105(4), 489-523.
Referencias de obras literarias, periodísticas y cinematográficas
Auster, P. (1994). El cuaderno rojo. (Traducción de Navarro, J.). Barcelona: Anagrama (Colección Quinteto).
Campos, M. A. (2001). Literatura en voz alta: entrevistas con escritores. Costa Rica: Universidad Nacional Costa Rica.
Careaga, R. (2014). Paul Auster, escritor: “Escribir es como una enfermedad, el mundo real no es suficiente.” La Tercera. Recuperado de: https://www.latercera.com/noticia/paul-auster-escritor-escribir-es-como-una-enfermedad-el-mundo-real-no-es-suficiente/
Esopo. (2015). Fábulas de Esopo. (Traducción de Sabaté Font, J.). Barcelona: Penguin clásicos.
Jiménez, D. (2013). El lugar más feliz del mundo. Madrid: Kailas Editorial.
Mann, T. (2012). La montaña mágica. (Traducción de García Adánez, I.). Barcelona: Edhasa.
Montaigne, M. E. (2014). Ensayos. (Traducción de Román y Salamero, C., Thiebaut, C., Marinas, J. M. y G. Torné). Barcelona: Penguin clásicos.
Monterroso, A. (1998). La oveja negra y demás fábulas. Madrid: Alfaguara
_________ (2014). El paraíso imperfecto: antología tímida. Barcelona: Debolsillo.
Nabokov, V. (1975). Lolita. (Traducción de Tejedor, E.). Barcelona: Grijalbo.
Thoreau, H. D. (2011). Desobediencia civil y otros textos. (Traducción de Cardona, F.L.). Barcelona: Ediciones Brontes. Weiner, M. (productor). (2007). Mad Men [serie de TV]. California: AMC, Lionsgate television.
Once the text is accepted for publication in Quadripartita Ratio, the authors must sign two legal documents: the License of Use and the Declaration of Authorship.
With the License of Use, the authors agree to the publication and diffusion of their work (integration in databases, diffusion in our social media, possible reeditions, etc.). However, it authorizes the download, reproduction and distribution of all published content, as long as the content is not modified and the source is indicated (name of the journal, volume, number, pages and electronic address of the document).
With the Declaration of Authorship, the authors manifest that the work is theirs, original and unpublished.
