The uses of questioning in Plato

  • Mauricio Méndez Huerta Universidad de Guadalajara
  • Carlos Fernando Ramírez González Universidad de Guadalajara
Keywords: Plato, method, interrogation, ontology, epistemology.

Abstract

Reception: October 15, 2015         Accepted: January 7, 2016       This paper aims to explain some methodological uses of interrogation in the philosophical approach of Plato. To assess properly the thought of the Athenian thinker is required as a necessary condition to accept the following postulations: a) you have to understand Plato’s work as an interrelated whole; b) the texts of the Greek thinker are reprocessed over time, implying his own intellectual development; c) the methods are subordinated to ontological and epistemological considerations; d) in the Platonic dialogues there is a spokesman for the author’s thesis. These assumptions lead to establish five different uses of interrogation: 1) the Socratic dialogue, which is refutative; 2) maieutics, understood as a reorientation of interrogation; 3) dialectics is meant as a guide to the search for truth; 4) the hypothetical interrogation, which aims to explore the possibilities of opposing thesis; 5) the division, which aims to the analytical dissociation of concepts. The paper presents and justifies the five ways to use interrogation in Platonic philosophy.

References

CORNFORD, F. M. (1989). Platón y Parménides. Madrid: Visor.

HIRSCHBERGER, J. (1985). Historia de la Filosofía. Tomo I. Barcelona: Herder.

KRÄMER, H. (1996). Platón y los fundamentos de la metafísica. Venezuela: Monte Ávila.

PERELMAN, Ch. (1997). El imperio Retórico. Bogotá: Editorial Norma.

PLATÓN (1997). Diálogos (8 tomos). Madrid: Gredos.

ROSS, D. (1997). Teoría de las Ideas de Platón. Madrid: Cátedra.

Scott, G. A. (2002). Does Socrates Have a Method?. EE.UU.: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Vlastos, G. (1994). Socratic Studies. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Published
2016-02-29
Section
Articles