Reseña de: Frans H. van Eemeren (2015): Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Prama-Dialectics, Cham (CH), Springe (Argumentation Library, 27), 880 pp.
Abstract
SIN RESUMENReferences
BEARDSLEY, M. C. (1950). Practical logic. Nueva York: Prentice-Hall.
CRAWSHAY-WILLIAMS, R. (1957). Methods and criteria of reasoning: An inquiry into the structure of controversy. Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
EEMEREN, F. H. van (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam-Filadelfia: John Benjamins.
EEMEREN, F. H. van y R. GROOTENDORST (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Berlín: de Gruyter.
EEMEREN, F. H. van y R. GROOTENDORST (1989). “Writing argumentative texts. From analysis to presentation: A pragma-dialectical approach”. En B. E. Gronbeck (Ed.), Spheres of argument: Proceedings
of the 6th SCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 324-330). Annandale (VA): Speech Communication Association.
EEMEREN, F. H. van y R. GROOTENDORST (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
EEMEREN, F. H. van y R. GROOTENDORST (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
EEMEREN, F. H. van, B. J. GARSSEN y B. MEUFFELS (2009). Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness: Empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. Dordrecht: Springer.
EEMEREN, F. H. van, B. J. GARSSEN, T. van HAAFTEN, E. C. W. KRABBE, A. F. SNOECK Henkemans y J. H. M. WAGEMANS (2014). Handbook of argumentation theory: An overview of classical and neo-classical
perspectives on argumentation and modern theoretical approaches to argumentative discourse. Dordrecht: Springer.
EEMEREN, F. H. van, R. GROOTENDORST y T. KRUIGER (1978, 1981). Argumentatietheorie [Teoría de la argumentación]. (1a y 2a edición). Utrecht: Het Spectrum.
EEMEREN, F. H. van, R. GROOTENDORST, A. F. SNOECK Henkemans, con J. A. BLAIR, R.H. JOHNSON, E.C.W. KRABBE, C. PLANTIN, D.N. WALTON, C.A. WILLARD, J. WOODS y D. ZAREFSKY (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: Handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.
EEMEREN, F. H. van, R. GROOTENDORST y A. F. SNOECK Henkemans (2002). Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
EEMEREN, F. H. van, R. GROOTENDORST, S. JACKSON y S. JOCOBS (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa (AL): University of Alabama Press.
EEMEREN, F. H. van, P. HOUTLOSSER y A. F. SNOECK Henkemans (2007). Argumentative indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer.
FINOCCHIARO, M. A. (1974). The concept of ad hominem argument in Galileo and Locke. The Philosophical Forum, 5, 394-404.
GILBERT, M. A. (1979). How to win an argument.
GILBERT, M. A. (2014). Arguing with people. Calgary: Broadview Press.
HAMBLIN, Ch. C. (1970). Fallacies. Londres: Methuen.
HASTINGS, A. (1962). A reformulation of the modes of reasoning in argumentation. Disertación doctoral, Northwestern University.
JOHNSON, R. y A. C. BLAIR (1977). Logical self-defense.
JOHNSTONE, H. W., Jr. (1959). Philosophy and argument. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
KENNEDY, G. A. (1963). The art of persuasion in Greece. Princeton: University Press.
KENNEDY, G. A. (1972). The art of rhetoric in the Roman world 300 A.C.–A.D. 300. Princeton: University Press.
KENNEDY, G. A. (1983). Greek rhetoric under Christian emperors. Princeton: University Press.
LEAL Carretero, F. (ed.) (2015). Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: Estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren. Guadalajara: Editorial Universitaria.
NAESS, A. (1953). Interpretation and preciseness. Oslo: I Kommission Hos Jacob Dybwad.
PERELMAN, Ch. y L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1958). Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. París:Presses Universitaires de France.
TOULMIN, S. C. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: University Press.
WOODS, J. (2006). “Pragma-dialectics: A retrospective”. En P. Houtlosser y A. van Rees (eds.), Considering pragma-dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 301-312). New York & London: Routledge.
WOODS, J. y D. Walton (1975). Petitio principii. Synthese, 31, 107-127.
Once the text is accepted for publication in Quadripartita Ratio, the authors must sign two legal documents: the License of Use and the Declaration of Authorship.
With the License of Use, the authors agree to the publication and diffusion of their work (integration in databases, diffusion in our social media, possible reeditions, etc.). However, it authorizes the download, reproduction and distribution of all published content, as long as the content is not modified and the source is indicated (name of the journal, volume, number, pages and electronic address of the document).
With the Declaration of Authorship, the authors manifest that the work is theirs, original and unpublished.
